Lateral thinking about education

The institutionalised unfairness of the British education system has garnered many miles of news print. Most top jobs in most sectors go to the privately educated or those from the very best state schools who have also gone to Oxbridge or the best of the Russell Group. Much money has been poured into trying to correct the imbalance. But it’s just too damn hard. Wealthier Middle class parents can move near the better state schools and if their finances won’t stretch to that they may be able to at least fund some tutoring on the side.

Some majorly lateral thinking is clearly needed. And personally I don’t buy the Free School initiative. I want the State to be in charge of education  - parents are not innately talented beings who should be in charge of all aspects of their child’s wellbeing. Well I’m not anyway.

George Monbiot, whose weekly Guardian column I am often deeply irritated by, today mentions a darn good idea that was once proposed by the journalist Peter Wilby. He suggests changing Oxbridge application process so that they take only the 2 brightest children from every school. The next best universities then take the next 2 brightest and so on. Pushy parent s would be scrambling to get their kids into the local failing school s to bolster their chances. Private schools would collapse and there would be a far wider distribution of equality both at schools and of course at universities.

That’s what I call creative thinking.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/may/24/oxbridge-access-fair-top-...



CMGRP UK Limited | Registered office: Ground Floor, 84 Eccleston Square, London SW1V 1PX, England | Registered number: 2442501

This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive
this message for the intended recipient), you may not use, copy, disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained
in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message.

Thank you very much.

Coffee, tea, me?

Carte Noire is a great example of a brand really coming to life online. Their Carte Noire Readers initiative, launched last year, with attractive, well known actors reading passages from great novels could have fallen flat. Or worse just been plain embarrassing. But it’s well executed and the casting is clever, with proper actors like Dominic West and Greg Wise rather than more obvious tabloid tarts. Navigation of the website is easy; first you chose your preferred performer, then which reading you would like to hear. The novels are mainly literary but with a romantic bent – “Persuasion”, “Sons and Lovers”, “North and South” for example.  The dashing actors cosy up on sofas inviting a romantically-inclined target audience to enjoy a more seductive coffee break. It’s updated regularly – Joseph Fiennes has just joined the line up – giving plenty of reasons to revisit.

One complaint. Try as I might I can’t seem to get the clip of Dominic West reading “Lady Chatterley’s Lover “ to work. Curses! www.cartenoire.co.uk

Earth to Britain

This post on Earth Hour from Mums Rock got me thinking. http://www.mumsrock.com/articles/speed-parenting/rock-guides-to-life/earth-hour-2010-switching-off-to-global-warming There’s little not to like about Earth Hour, it’s credible, green, community-orientated and will even save you money. Yet given that it’s been going since 2007 there’s surprisingly little awareness of it in the UK. This despite the fact that over a billion people have signed up and last year Buckingham Palace took part.

“So I know what you’re thinking. Why didn’t I know about this? Well, sometimes even the best ideas take a little time to get going. And surprisingly, for a nation famed for gossiping over the garden fence, it’s taken us Brits a bit longer to spread the word.”

Mums Rock don’t profess to be social media experts but maybe they have a point. Hope the word spreads better this year.

luxury branding "is all about sterilising everything."

Part of Jermyn street is apparently to be relaunched as St James's Gateway. Sounds very grim to me. Michael Bywater has written a sorrowful love letter to the English gent who patronised Jermyn Street. And that may never have existed except in his imagination and that of golden age crime writers like Dorothy L Sayers and Margery Allingham. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/fashion/features/a-farewell-to-britains-most-stylish-street-1918791.html

The quote about luxury branding is from the man who used to run Bates, the beautifully old-fashioned hat shop that has had to close because of the redevelopment.

 

 

Michael Foot, articulacy and passion

 

 “We are not here in this world to find elegant solutions, pregnant with initiative, or to serve the ways and modes of profitable progress. No, we are here to provide for all those who are weaker and hungrier, more battered and crippled than ourselves. That is our only certain good and great purpose on earth, and if you ask me about those insoluble economic problems that may arise if the top is deprived of their initiative, I would answer ‘To hell with them.’ The top is greedy and mean and will always find a way to take care of themselves. They always do.”

 

From the mouths of babes

Tavi the 13 year old fashion blogger is  something of a genius in my opinion. I loved her riposte to Tanya Gold’s anti-fashion rant in the Guardian

http://tavi-thenewgirlintown.blogspot.com/2010/01/fashion-basically-also-team-conan.html

And I was positively moved by her passion for an ebay-bought 1987 edition of iD which I can actually remember reading as a kilt-wearing schoolgirl, (convent uniform sadly, not Westwood)  http://tavi-thenewgirlintown.blogspot.com/2010/01/pun-that-has-to-do-with-both-i-d-as.html Sarah Stockbridge! In a crown! With the rocking horse shoes! Another goddess of fashion. Actually I recently read a novel she wrote (Stockbridge not Tavi) and it was really rather good.....

(download)

What PR can learn from Advertising

The demise of advertising has often been predicted. Back in the 90s when I was a grad trainee at BMP DDB, we were terrified of the advance of the management consultant, that PowerPoint toting, grey-suited assassin. As a result we were all sent on a mini-MBA course and told to understand our clients business a lot better. Very sensible advice.  Advertising seemed to weather that particular storm. Why? Because the good ones are very good at what they do. And what exactly is that? I hear you ask. Well it may raise a titter somewhere in the audience but I would say that what ad agencies have always done and still do, is build brands. Surely PR does this too? Well of course but I think brand-building is still something PR is developing as a skill-set.

So what do ad agencies know about brands? They know it’s nothing to be coy about. It’s many years since ‘brands’ were just the province of soap powder, but many business leaders are still guilty of talking about reputation or proposition when really they should be talking about their brand. They could learn a thing or two from those soap power manufacturers. Brand onions, wheels, keys, and temples are easy to mock. But how much easier is it for a Marketing services professional to do their job when these things are clearly defined? Often Advertising agencies are deeply involved in creating these brand structures. They are fortunate to be in this position as it gives them an insight into and familiarity with the language, tone and personality of a brand that PR agencies often lack. We need to make a habit of asking for this information from our clients and must be able to demonstrate that we understand their uses and be able to bring them to life and build on them through our work. And if we have clients that aren’t well versed in this sort of thinking then we must demonstrate our strategic worth by helping them construct their own brand models.

Another subject close to ad agencies heart is that of the Target Audience. As a graduate trainee I was told, the planner’s role was to act as the ‘voice of the consumer’ in the strategic and creative development process. I loved the idea of being the voice of reason, of reality, in trendy, sophisticated ad land. Of course it wasn’t as simple as that. In order to understand the consumer one has to be genuinely interested in contemporary culture, to have some concept of what is going on in popular soap operas, to occasionally read tabloid newspapers. You also had to be able to make sense of data sources like TGI and Millward Brown and understand the ins and outs of the infamous Link test. But above all we never allowed the creative department to forget the existence of this unpredictable person called the consumer. In PR we are sometimes deflected by the importance journalists and bloggers and other opinion leaders.  They are of course central to what we do in PR. But whose opinion are we trying to influence with their help? Exactly. 

The best contribution planning can make to any brand or communications task is to present a well-defined problem.  It focuses the account team (and client) on identifying the right solution for the issue in hand rather than simply the one you’d all prefer. You can get all creative and lateral in the sure knowledge that you know exactly what you’re trying to achieve. Whereas advertising agencies like to boil everything down to a beautiful sound bite or proposition in order to brief their numerous creative teams, PR really isn’t that reductive. It’s about focussing on the core story that you have to tell, one that may have multiple audiences, and even multiple messages. But it is the one that will address the main problem and blow it out of the water.

Finally, advertising agencies are generally pretty comfortable with measurement. The main thing to learn here is that measurement isn’t something that happens at the end of the process. It’s crucial that it is agreed upfront with the client exactly how success will be measured. In an ideal world if there is nothing suitable in place the client might decide to set up a bespoke measurement study to look at the contribution made by PR activity to agreed measures. However if the project’s objectives centre around changing brand perceptions it might make sense to look at existing data sources such as brand image measures from the clients own tracking study. The important thing is to agree in advance what success will look like.

Advertising is very good at certain things; particularly understanding how brands work and what outstanding creativity looks like. But PR shouldn’t feel too shabby in comparison. No specialism knows more about the power of storytelling than PR, more about how to engage with people in a way that will last and develop. It is for this reason that our industry is arguably at the forefront of exploiting the opportunities raised by the growth of social media. Advertising has lots to learn from us.

Read the other great articles from round the Weber Shandwick network at http://www.webershandwick.co.uk/newsletters/18.pdf

 

CMGRP UK Limited | Registered office: Ground Floor, 84 Eccleston Square, London SW1V 1PX, England | Registered number: 2442501

This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive

this message for the intended recipient), you may not use, copy, disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained

in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message.

Thank you very much.

 

Follow the bear

Article-1158078-01c1681e000004

So Golden Shred is commencing a tie up with my fellow Peruvian (I am a 16th Peruvian, honest) Paddington Bear. About time too! I have been deeply saddened to read of the decline of this prince amongst preserves (marmalade that is - Golden Shred hasn't been my brand of choice since I was a child). But actually that's what is so great about this tie-up. Marmalade is mainly bought by over-45s and it’s about time something a little more loveable than the Robertson golliwog was used (they didn't drop that because it was racist honest guv). It’s bizarre it has taken them so long. The tie up with Roald Dahl seemed random and wasn't much of a success. Up with marmalade. And my distant cousin.

 

CMGRP UK Limited | Registered office: Ground Floor, 84 Eccleston Square, London SW1V 1PX, England | Registered number: 2442501

This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive

this message for the intended recipient), you may not use, copy, disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained

in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message.

Thank you very much.

McQueen: designer vs. the brand

The death of Alexander McQueen has brought into question the future of his label, the assumption being that without his driving vision and unique creativity, it couldn’t continue to exist. At first was what I thought too. After all this is the man who brought us the Bumster trouser – and no I’m not being sarcastic. Wonder why we all wear skinny low hung jeans? Well look no further than the buttock revealing trouser that McQueen produced in his 1996 Dante collection. And the strong jacket shapes that have been around for a couple of seasons? Well some people would attribute the trend to Balmain’s bumpy-shouldered numbers. But I reckon McQueen’s tailored, sexy strong silhouette has been quietly influencing us for a while. Check out this gorgeous black jacket and leather shorts from 2006.

So I was of the opinion that the label couldn’t continue to function without the man himself. And then I began to think about what the brand means to me: strength, intelligence, creativity, power. When a brand has what is essentially a very clear brief, it should be possible to continue to deliver the product that customers want. Chloe managed to follow on from Stella McCartney‘s success with the very successful Phoebe Philo followed by the fabulous Hannah MacGibbon. Versace has gone from strength to strength under Donatella – she has managed to refresh and reinvigorate the uber-label without losing it’s essential Italian sexiness and glamour.  

Many of these designers are themselves as important to the brand as the clothes themselves; women love to read about Stella, know what she’s wearing (her clothes natch), who’s she’s hanging with. And Donatella really seems to live the dream she represents on her catwalk shows. In contrast McQueen has been far more low profile. He didn’t embody the brand himself. I believe the right designer or design team would be able to capture the essence of what makes the McQueen label so covetable.

(The gorgeous yellow gown illustrates no point at all. I just think it is breathtakingly gorgeous).

 

CMGRP UK Limited | Registered office: Ground Floor, 84 Eccleston Square, London SW1V 1PX, England | Registered number: 2442501

This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive

this message for the intended recipient), you may not use, copy, disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained

in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message.

Thank you very much.

 

(download)

Social Contagion

 

I’ve been reading a lot about Nicholas Christakis recently, the Harvard professor with a theory (and a book, of course http://tinyurl.com/yjrhg4h) about something he calls “Social Contagion”. It’s about the power of social networks to influence our behaviours. Well hey that’s pretty obvious you say. Well yes, but he also believes that people are influenced not only by friends but even friends of friends that we don’t meet. Undesirable things like obesity , war, suicide are just as likely to be spread as happiness, charitable giving and love. Of course the ‘good’ networks are arguably stronger as you are more likely to cut ties with the person that gives you Herpes than the one who leads you to quit smoking. "It is the spread of the good things that vindicates the whole reason we live our lives in networks," he says.  

His thesis may sound familiar, perhaps a little reminiscent of “The Tipping Point”, “Herd” or “Nudge” http://tinyurl.com/yj4lgkk (love the latter by the way). But the fact that he is a qualified clinical doctor as well as a social scientist and healthcare adviser makes him something of a fresh voice ion the scene. Some good data sits behind the colourful ideas. They used a study into Heart Disease (the Framingham Heart Study) which tracked the cardiovascular health of more than 5,000 people since 1948 to reconstruct digitally their social networks and the effect they had on individuals and the group. Some great images have come from it such as the Obesity Network http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/social-networks/ Your friends really can make you fat!

The book is on my colleagues desk. She hasn’t read it yet. Will race her to it.

About

A planner. Have done ads, direct marketing, PR and now back in adland running planning at Publicis London.